Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Variations in Abortion Access and Perception

Thu, August 31, 4:00 to 5:30pm PDT (4:00 to 5:30pm PDT), LACC, 405

Session Submission Type: Created Panel

Session Description

The papers on this panel all approach the topic of abortion access and public perception. Buyaker’s paper uses a longitudinal study of US adults in order to examine how public attitudes toward the role of federal and state governments are influenced by individual support for legal abortions in Texas and Mississippi. Bissonnette draws on extensive fieldwork in four US states to assess how language, knowledge and access to information impact how Latina women perceive and experience their access to abortion in a pre and post-Dobbs world. Shrestha et al. use a nationally representative survey of American adults to investigate the impact of the Dobbs decision on attitudes towards abortion permissiveness. Finally, Pullan and Gannon utilize a mixed-methods approach to explore puzzles in the rate of conscientious objection to abortion provision by gynecologists in Italy. They find that the conscientious objection rate may be significantly higher than reported—a fact which has implications both for government data integrity as well as public understanding of access to abortion services. Together, these papers fill an important gap in research about both the public’s perception of abortion and the government’s role in it.

Sub Unit

Individual Presentations

Chair

Discussants