Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Public Perceptions and Health Communication

Sat, September 2, 4:00 to 5:30pm PDT (4:00 to 5:30pm PDT), LACC, 510

Session Submission Type: Created Panel

Session Description

The papers on this panel all explore public perceptions of hot button health policy topics. Neeman uses data from a nationally representative conjoint experiment to examine public perceptions of deservingness for home and community-based services (HCBS) designed to assist people with disabilities and older adults remain in the community and avoid institutionalization. Freedman and Warwick situate the highly partisan and polarized debate about COVID-19 vaccination policy within broader debates about trust in science, and confidence in government actors and regulatory institutions through a comparison with debates about genetically modified organisms (GMOs)—a much less partisan issue. The authors use an original module of the 2022 Cooperative Election Study (CES) to investigate whether the salience of the politically charged, highly polarized issue of COVID-19 vaccination has the potential to prime public opinion about GMOs. Uhlaner investigates whether wearing a mask for health and public health reasons is highly susceptible to “relational goods,” that is to the expectations of the people one cares about. Finally, Sylvester and Haeder exam organ donation processes and the need for reform. They test different messaging approaches relating to race, ethnicity, and disease type and the effects on perceptions of "deservingness." Together, these papers raise interrelated questions about effective health communication, polarization, and regulatory authority.

Sub Unit

Individual Presentations

Chair

Discussants