Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Post-Soviet leaders have often sought to promote regional development to ensure the stability of their regime. To this end, the executive branch allocates equalizing transfers to eliminate the development gap between the center and the periphery. Existing research on the allocation of these transfers has mainly focused on center-periphery relations, disregarding interest groups that represent specific regions. I argue that regions that are represented by oligarchs and regional leaders in the national legislature receive more funds from equalizing transfers compared to other regions. Using an original dataset for equalizing transfers in 63 municipalities in the Republic of Georgia, I employ a heterogeneous difference in differences/event study design to show how oligarchs and regional interest groups influenced the allocation of equalizing transfers between 2009 and 2020. My results are consistent with my hypothesis, indicating that municipalities represented by oligarchs and regional interest groups receive more funds from equalizing transfers compared to other municipalities.