Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Changing a status quo policy requires (1) the development of a policy alternative and (2) a vote or choice for the alternative over retaining the status quo policy. In this paper, I consider a formal model of policymaking in which the decision-maker does not automatically consider every developed policy proposal. Instead, a policy developer must expend resources to increase the likelihood of consideration. I study how developers allocate resources between generating high-quality proposals and costly consideration. I discuss an application to congressional policymaking and the allocation of committee resources between policy development and costly consideration.