Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
To what extent, if any, does power shape political attitudes and beliefs? Psychologists conceptualize power as a psychological state – a suite of affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes – activated by control over valued resources. Treatments that manipulate this psychological state have proven valid and reliable experimentally. By integrating this experimental tool from social psychology with insights within international relations, this study seeks to address critical gaps in past research, including consistent differences in elite and public opinion toward state use of force. This study proposes that the psychological state of power – rooted in rule-making authority, strategic positions, and / or geopolitical dynamics – helps explain U.S. elite and public opinion gaps in areas of foreign policy and domestic policing. These are topics where the state’s monopoly of violence takes center-stage. By presenting original survey experiment results, we seek to illustrate how experimentally manipulating power can aid political scientists in gaining additional traction on issues prominent in international relations.