Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Does repression provoke resistance? Divergent empirical findings have been presented in the literature. Incorporating potential public support for repression, this paper emphasizes that the ’credibility of obedient commitment’ plays a key role in understanding this divergence: Compliance with state repression largely depends on the state’s reliability in rewarding obedience. The massacres in Early Qing and the resulting heterogeneous resistance patterns serve as a historical precedent. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) and instrumental variables (IV) estimation, the empirical findings reveal that state betrayals intensified resistance following the massacres, while credible assurances mitigated it. These theoretical and empirical insights shed light on scholarly efforts regarding “punishment puzzles,”thus contributing to the discussion of repression, resistance, and authoritarian resilience.