Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Effectively speaking for the global majority of Rousseau’s readers going back to the Jacobins, C.L.R. James affirmed simply in 1968 that ‘Rousseau was a revolutionary…there is no question about that’. The next year Judith Shklar published Men and Citizens, a book flatly denying that claim. The un- or anti-revolutionary Rousseau subsequently built by academic political theorists on the foundation Shklar laid is one that I contend the global majority of his readers would find, not only unrecognizable, but unpersuasive. Recovering the revolutionary Rousseau, I undertake to show, in the terms of academic political theory, why such reactions would be justified.