Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Location
About APSA
Bluesky
X (Twitter)
Strong opposition performance in authoritarian elections can induce insider challenges through defection; this study asks whether it also increases immediate outsider challenge in the form of post-election protest. I argue that opposition performance functions as a mobilizing signal: it publicly indicates weaker regime control over electoral outcomes and a larger opposition support base, thereby shaping the conditions under which opposition mobilization becomes feasible. Accordingly, stronger opposition performance should raise the likelihood of post-election protest and, within protest waves, concentrate protest activity in opposition-held regions. Using existing cross-national data and a newly assembled dataset linking electoral returns to post-election protest at national and subnational levels, I find consistent evidence across multiple identification strategies and robustness checks that stronger opposition performance predicts both a higher probability of post-election protest and a more opposition-centered spatial pattern. These results underscore opposition performance as a key indicator for anticipating contentious dynamics and regime stability during authoritarian election cycles.