Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Location
About APSA
Bluesky
X (Twitter)
The Soviet Union imposed an inadvertent dilemma on the US by deploying missiles to Cuba. Nearly alone, Kennedy judged that US acquiescence risked US prestige and its status as hegemon in the post-1945 liberal order because the US was unwilling to exercise its power. If it acted, it risked perception that it was reckless. This explanation neatly addresses the secrecy of the trade of missiles in Turkey. Khrushchev probably did not understand the threat that deployment posed. This political science explanation differs from standard historical explanations that emphasize views of Kennedy’s advisers, who focused on increased Soviet capabilities and Berlin. My argument has important policy implications: countries may brandish nuclear weapons without understanding the stakes, the stakes for each party may be different, and threats against a hegemon may induce a response based on status rather than on the claimed threat.