Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Location
About APSA
Bluesky
X (Twitter)
How does rising exposure to geopolitical risks (GPRs) shape firms’ political strategies? While existing work shows that rising geopolitical risks depress economic activity and investment, we know little about their effect on corporate political strategies. I argue that geopolitical risks create uncertainty, and exposed firms have greater incentives to expand their political efforts to shield themselves and secure exemptions before committing capital. To test this argument, I measure firms’ exposure to geopolitical risks by applying automated text analysis methods to a variety of corporate documents, such as earnings-call transcripts and the risk-factor sections of 10-K and 20-F filings. The results show that (i) rising GPR exposure increases firms’ geopolitical lobbying intensity; (ii) while geoeconomic exposure draws entry into geopolitical lobbying, security-based exposure increases the intensity of spending among already active firms; and (iii) the type of geopolitical risk exposure increases lobbying efforts toward the relevant agencies—geoeconomic to trade, security to defense. These findings shed new light on the consequences of rising geopolitical risks for firms’ political behavior.