The Comparative Method in Practice: Analytical Case Networks in the Study of Revolution

• In Event: 479 - Section on Global and Transnational Sociology Roundtable Session (one-hour).
  In Refereed Roundtable: Table 02. Methodology

Abstract

Comparative analysis is an excellent method for a variety of questions, yet knowledge accumulation within a comparative field is dependent on its overall typical practice. One aspect of practice—the case selection of all comparative studies of revolution published between 1970 and 2009—is examined through content analysis, case frequency, and social network analysis. In contrast to the expectations of comparativists, results do not show convergence in methods, greater methodological awareness, or increasing generalizability over time. The study of revolution has also fragmented empirically in recent decades, obscuring transnational dimensions of contention. Thus, the field is not well positioned to confirm or reject generalizable findings about revolution, and the institutionalization of comparative methodology has not, unfortunately, led to the widespread adoption of best practices. The solution to these problems is to recapture the global and universal imagination of second wave historical sociology.

Author

• Colin J. Beck, Pomona College