The Post-Self in Science

• In Event: 540 - Section on Science, Knowledge, and Technology Roundtable Session (one-hour).
  In Refereed Roundtable: Section on Science, Knowledge, and Technology Roundtables (one-hour). Table 01. Scientific Careers and Education

Abstract

Achievement is paradigmatically central to science: knowledge exists only after it has been socially certified by others in a field. Scientists therefore operate as a prime means by which people in a field are judged to have influence through their work. This study examines the construction of the “post-self” in science, understood as the ways by which scientists desire to be remembered by those who, both formally and informally, evaluate their contributions. It is found that the post-self in science is highly delimited in content and meaning, but patterns of the post-self vary by where scientists work, their age, and the level of their success. While achievement in science is purportedly paramount, very few scientists are great achievers. Consequently, memory of the self is rendered problematic in the absence of scientific influence. The discussion reveals how scientists reconcile this paradox. It explores two predominant ways in which scientists create a post-self: one in which achievement works on a scientist’s behalf, and another in which it does not. While the two ways to a post-self are believed to be at odds, each also is cast as superior, and thereby operates to socially secure a place in science.

Author

• Joseph C. Hermanowicz, University of Georgia