Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Poverty is one of the most important concepts in the social sciences, yet commonly-used thresholds for the operationalization of poverty have little or no conceptual basis. This is especially true of the "social exclusion" poverty concept, where the arbitrary threshold of missing k ≥ 3 items from a list of socially defined necessities is the accepted operationalization. This paper presents a conceptual framework for meaningfully setting k based on the properties of the Poisson distribution. If households experienced problems (such as the non-possession of necessities) at random, the incidence of such problems would follow a Poisson distribution. In fact, problems are not experienced at random and the empirical distribution of problems has a heavy right tail. We define the poverty threshold k as the number of problems at which this heavy tail begins. We use data from the 2011 Swiss Household Panel to illustrate this approach for three poverty concepts: conventional social exclusion based on non-affordability of items ("afford-deprivation"), simplified social exclusion based on non-possession of items ("possess-deprivation"), and a novel approach based on Michael Marmot's status syndrome concept ("high life burden"). Our analyses suggest thresholds of k ≥ 2 for conventional possess-deprivation, k ≥ 5 for afford-deprivation, and k ≥ 6 for high life burden. In addition to providing a rationale for k, the Poisson-based approach allows for the systematic variation of k in different empirical contexts. It also supports the estimation of real poverty rates in which the accidentally miscategorized non-poor have been subtracted from the nominal rate.