Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
We develop an analytical approach to understanding the social foundations of contestations over social welfare and socially appropriate solutions. Borrowing a classification system from Biggart & Delbridge (2004), we highlight four distinct logics that motivate and constrain actors in different sectors. Recognizing that social goods are often valued by multiple sectors, each with different institutional logics and legitimacy needs, we argue that the most acceptable solutions for social welfare problems will draw on multiple logics that are embedded in different legitimate institutions. This approach moves beyond the dominant utilitarian approach to contextualize social welfare solutions within diverse institutional and cultural settings. We use several case studies on water governance to demonstrate the utility of this approach, but these insights also extend to other social welfare problems involving the allocation of resources whose scarcity threatens human survival and dignity.