Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Despite claims that Bourdieu’s conception of habitus cannot account for reflexive action, this paper reworks his theory of habitus by suggesting that social selves are always situated at the intersection of multiple and competing social locations (or field positions), which yields the embodied self the capacity for reflexivity and social change. To make this argument, the paper draws insight from the field of critical realism. The critical realist and Bourdieusian conceptions of action fundamentally disagree on a number of fronts: the social nature of the self/body; the synthetic versus dualistic relationship between structure and agency; the link between morphogenesis and reflexivity. Despite these differences, the author argues that re-reading Bourdieu’s theories with attention to some of the core tenets of critical realism can provide insights on how the habitus is capable of reflexive, strategic action and can even produce social change.