Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
In this paper, I develop the concept of escalating mutual obligation as a motivation for continued collective action. I do this by examining the dynamic that developed between the three principle collectivities in the Wisconsin Uprising of 2011, which was one of the largest sustained collective actions in the history of the United States. I argue that the various categories of politicians and protesters in opposition to Governor Walker's "budget repair" bill effectively pushed one another to establish and continue relatively extreme and politically risky forms of resistance. Analysis of political opportunities is insufficient to explain this dynamic, as is pure rational-strategic calculation, as are political opportunities in combination with rational-strategic calculation. With a foot in both these perspectives, my new concept of escalating mutual obligation can sufficiently explain this dynamics of this historically important case.