Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Efforts to increase sustainability are increasingly being promulgated using non-state forms of governance. Currently, there are multiple multi-stakeholder initiatives working to develop sustainability standards and metrics for agriculture. These include: LEO-4000, Field to Market, the Stewardship Index for Specialty Crops, and the Sustainability Consortium. Using the sustainable agriculture initiatives as case studies, this paper examines the capacity of multi-stakeholder governance to regulate the environmental impacts of US agriculture. Specifically, using Paul Thompson’s (2010) tripartite sustainability framework, the proposed sustainability standards and metrics for United States agriculture is assessed. Our findings indicate hat the current political-economic stakeholder nexus is producing incremental adjustments to the status quo of industrial agriculture. Put differently, the standards and metrics being produced by these initiatives are largely advancing programs of sustainable intensification in which sustainability is equated with increasing resource efficiencies. Hence, our research problematizes the efficacy of non-state governance approaches for transformative change.