Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Studying perceptions of discrimination (PD) among immigrants is a sensitive enterprise. Not only are the ways that all individuals perceive, understand, and react to discrimination multiple and complex. In the case of immigrants, added heterogeneity along a number of axes – e.g., length of time spent in a receiving country, language ability, socialization experience regarding the definitions of what constitutes unfair treatment in either the sending country or receiving country, and even interpersonal sensitivity to rejection – complicates social scientific understanding of their perceptions further. In this article, we review the literature on perceived discrimination among immigrant-origin populations as it is conceptualized and operationalized in contemporary survey research. We then describe and present results from a pilot survey that we developed and fielded to a nonrandom convenience sample of 159 Chinese and Mexican immigrants living in the Boston, Chicago, and Seattle (United States) and Toronto and London (Canada) metropolitan areas. As an exploratory pilot study, this survey instrument was purposively designed to include new questions with more refined response categories and that are more sensitive to the immigrant experience. Our results suggest that, at least regarding new immigrant populations, how survey questions about PD are structured and phrased matter greatly; the more scholars can specify clearly the contexts, frequency, and strength or type of PD, the more nuance they may be able to capture. In particular, we find that categorical PD questions and failure to control for interpersonal sensitivity may bias results.