Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
In almost all of the research that addresses categorical inequality, there has been an emphasis on discrimination or exclusion of some types of people from the benefits enjoyed by the normative in group. In much of the discussion of boundary work, there has been an implicit assumption about boundaries being created in order to keep some people out, but much less attention about how boundaries ensure that other types of people get in. I discuss in this paper the important distinctions between boundaries that ensure some people get in versus those that are intended to keep people out. Rather than being just different sides of the same coin (or same boundary), there are cognitive, political, legal, and economic implications about exclusion versus inclusion, about boundary work that is inclusive versus that which is exclusive.