Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Sociologists are increasingly recognizing the importance of cultural categories of worth in shaping public policy outcomes. At the same time, these accounts often rely on overly simplistic conceptions of deservingness based on the individual attributes of policy beneficiaries. This study takes a relational approach to understand how institutions are not only reflections of cultural categories but can create them as well. This is done in two ways. First, I propose a three-part theory of deservingness based on the individual characteristics of the beneficiaries as well as the social meaning attached to the transfer itself. Second, I demonstrate the usefully of this framework through a comparative analysis of changes to Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and the earned income and child tax credits (EITC, CTC) in the 1990s. I find that these “special monies” create distinct boundaries which shaped perceptions of deservingness among policy elites and the public at large and led to divergent policy trajectories.