Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
This paper investigates NP-stimulant use via 37 interviews with illicit drug-using and nonusing undergraduates at the University of Toronto, a top-tier research university. Of primary concern is developing understanding of the dynamics of drug acceptability operating within a competitive university context. Interviews are analyzed with attention to practices students engage in to assess NP-stimulant use, contextual pressures informing use, and discourses students draw from to position NP-stimulant acceptability. 'Instrumental' drug use--as contrasted with 'recreational' or 'problematic' use--is used to conceptualize this increasingly salient form of drug acceptability. Findings suggest NP-stimulant use is positioned as instrumental and acceptable in so far as it is prosthetic: that is, used as a tool which temporarily enhances alertness, but that neither fundamentally changes learning capacities of students beyond what one would be capable of in 'un-stimulated' circumstances, nor interferes with ongoing achievement through compulsive usage patterns. Thus instrumental NP-stimulant acceptability is rooted in an ethic of self-sufficiency. This ethic is held in tension by an orientation to sustained educational capital accrual, whereby the risk of NP-stimulant use to undermine self-sufficiency is located as appropriate in circumstances where one's educational credits are threatened. Implications for future research and university policy are considered.