Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
How do organizations that make significant physical, emotional, and intellectual demands foster commitment and loyalty from voluntary participants? In Coser’s 1974 analysis of what he refers to as “greedy institutions,” he sought to answer a similar question by turning to the structural elements that foster participants’ undivided commitment to particular institutions. In this paper I argue for the expansion of Coser’s initial framework to include attention to micro-interactional processes that foster organizational commitment and loyalty. After briefly discussing Puddephatt’s (2008) call for the inclusion of interaction rituals as key elements in greedy institutions, I turn to Goffman’s (1974) concept of frame analysis and its use in research on social movement organizations and the role that framing processes play in these organizations’ mobilization of individuals. This research suggests that frameworks and framing processes may serve as powerful—yet seldom studied—tools within greedy organizations. Finally, drawing upon data from an ethnographic study of Launch, a program that prepares low-income students of color to attend elite boarding schools, I investigate how framing processes serve to increase participants’ commitment and loyalty to the program. I find that, while Coser’s initial framework captures the “greedy” structural characteristics of the program, an analysis of frames—as they are cued both discursively and interactionally—is central to understanding the more micro-interactional level of the organization’s capacity to engender participants’ commitment.