Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
The relationship between social movements and place has been studied from different viewpoints in the social movements literature. While some aspects of this relationship - such as diffusion processes and policing tactics- have been studied more thoroughly, they rarely offer insights on how and why protesters choose specific spaces for protest. What makes a public space a good place for protest? How do protesters use public spaces? Do the physical form, symbolic meanings, location, and social characteristics of public spaces influence the ways in which protesters use the space? Using the case of the spaces of protest in Tehran, Iran (2009- 2011) this paper is an attempt for better understanding the relationship between public space and social movements. Based on this case, I try to answer a more general question: what aspects of an urban space make it an appropriate place for protest? I show that a combination of different factors, physical as well as social and cultural, shape the choices of places of protest. I also show how low risk and high risk participation might prioritize some elements over others in choosing some places of protest or avoiding others.