Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Abstract: Diversity rhetoric is being adopted by disability activists, particularly the concept of neurodiversity among autistic activists. This language is problematic in many ways: 1. It has not been successful for other social movements, particularly those around race; 2. It does not challenge the structures of power that produce the hierarchies between ‘disabled’ and ‘not;’ 3. It does not have traction among the autistic adults I worked with in my field work. Many accepted the premise of neurodiversity, but it did not activate a sense of identity politics that those who do advocate for neurodiversity hope to achieve. Finally, I offer an alternative to neurodiversity identity politics as a mode of creating a politics of autism, one that centers around queer theory and understanding of neurology as performative, emergent, and social.