An Examination of Factors Considered by Judicial Commissioners in Rutherford County, Tennessee to Determine Bail

• In Event: 477 - Section on Crime, Law, and Deviance Roundtable Session
  In Refereed Roundtable: Table 08. Inequality and Crime 2

Abstract

Rutherford County, Tennessee was sued in 2008 for setting bail that was based only on the charged offense and based on an antiquated preset bail schedule. As part of a settlement agreement, judicial commissioners promised to stop the practice and set bail only after considering all the factors predictive of nonappearance per state law and to keep a record of questions and responses. A random sample of questionnaires from 2012 was selected and various parametric and nonparametric statistical tests were conducted to check on the promise. Results indicated that Rutherford County judicial commissioners continue to set bail based primarily on the charged offense and consistent with the preset bail schedule previously used, in violation of the settlement agreement. Possible reasons for why this practice continues despite assurances to the contrary and recommendations for the future are made.

Authors

• Jerry Gonzalez, Middle Tennessee State University

• Brian Philip Hinote, Middle Tennessee State University

• Jackie Lea Eller, Middle Tennessee State University

• Meredith Huey Dye, Middle Tennessee State University