Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Most sociologists I have talked to were attracted to the discipline because they believed it would help them to contribute to making the world a better place. Yet, feminists and other critics have argued, mainstream social scientists have, however unintentionally, too often done the opposite. That is, the knowledge we are producing has tended to bolster the system of social domination. How does this happen? In this paper, I draw on evidence from interviews with 34 sociologists in North America and the UK to argue that the system through which we evaluate sociological scholarship pushes us to write sociology from the standpoint of the powerful. Problematic dimensions include our conventional segmentation of scholarly work into research, teaching and service, our emphasis on counting publications and weighing them by the status of the outlet, our devaluation of work that has immediate practical applications, and our standards for rhetorical style. I suggest ways to change our evaluation system to make Sociology what most of us want it to be: a basis for developing a more just society.