Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Members of fandom are deeply concerned with questions of authenticity. Insider status is contingent upon possessing an ‘authentic’ knowledge of the source material, and those who do not possess such knowledge are symbolically excluded. However, symbolic boundary-drawing around ‘authentic’ readings of the text and against ‘inauthentic’ consumers become pernicious when they interlock with social boundaries, such as gender. To illustrate this process, we examine a particular contest over authenticity—the fan discourse surrounding Damon Lindelof’s apology over Alice Eve’s underwear scene in the 2013 film, Star Trek: Into Darkness. We analyze over 500 comments on four separate articles about the dispute, focusing on how a large subset of presumably male fans construct the ‘authentic’ Star Trek fandom as a masculine space by dismissing those women (and non-hegemonically masculine men) who critique Eve’s objectification as ‘inauthentic’ consumers. We argue that symbolic claims of authenticity serve as a shield that justifies the social exclusion of women from the fandom, and that this rhetorical strategy is facilitated by the neoliberal and postfeminist context fans are embedded within.