Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
What do people “do” when they “do” politics? This paper investigates how the same social movement tactic—serving free food in a public place—is understood as “contentious politics” or not for different reasons by various actors. We use ethnographic fieldwork with two social movements to question the applicability of the unitary vision of state-centered social movement repertoires offered by the late Charles Tilly for understanding contemporary activism. While the concept of “repertoires” is useful for capturing how actors appear to have an internally coherent sense of what “doing politics” actually means, we argue that theories must account for the possibility that the same act can fall into multiple repertoires interpreted as targeting a wide range of institutions.