Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
In this article, I examine the recent findings of the Alternative Questionnaire Experiment (AQE) Final Report of the 2010 U.S. Census. In my discussion, I depart from the premise that the primary purpose of the collection of national and local data on race and ethnicity is to assess our progress in creating a more perfect union for all. I argue that you can’t kill two birds with one stone; specifically, the AQE conflation of race with ethnicity into one question has found that this questionnaire format produces less detailed information on Latinas/os. Furthermore, this sweeping change may have the unintended consequence of producing data that will be analytically bankrupt for capturing the very different lived realities of our heterogeneous Latina/o communities. The value added by having two separate questions on race and ethnicity, not only for Hispanics but also for other demographic groups, surely outweighs the cost of having poor data that will hinder our ability to assess distinct pathways of inequality, equity and inclusion.