Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Recent research suggests that poor outcomes—such as teen pregnancy or low academic achievement— of children raised in disadvantaged contexts are a consequence of cultural heterogeneity, that is, exposure to competing cultural models that create weak signaling resulting in negative outcomes. While empirically supported, this theory fails to account for the fact that some students from disadvantaged contexts have positive outcomes and the role that institutions play. To address these gaps, I propose a theory of cultural alignment using the case of technological competence. This theory attends to how institutional practices interact with individuals’ habits—which I define as the affective, cognitive, and behavior traits individuals have a propensity to enact. Individuals carry habits into institutional spheres and the level of alignment between habits and institutional practice determines how much effort is required to resolve this difference, by the individual or institution. Misalignment is not static; individuals’ habits can exert force—without conscious effort—to shift institutional practice and produce alignment in unexpected ways, such as more positive learning experiences and outcomes. More broadly, the theory of cultural alignment can be used to understand how cultural processes influence outcomes in various institutional settings such as higher education, healthcare, and employment.