Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Power both defines hegemonic ideals of masculine identities and is the goal of masculine competition (Connell 1995; Kaufman 1994; Kimmel 1994). Sometimes masculine power is characterized as being exceptionally in control; in other instances, masculine power is demonstrated by out of control impulses. Is control demonstrated through disciplined conduct or animal-like instincts, or both? Building upon masculinities theories and reproduction scholarship, this paper evaluates the multiple meanings of control, paying particular attention to the nuanced and contradictory ideals of control embedded in dominant masculine norms. Based on data from observations in 5 male infertility clinics and interviews with 24 heterosexual married infertile men in the United States, I argue that control is central to masculine identities, but is a versatile concept. Drawing on the examples of erection, testosterone, masturbation, and painful medical interventions, I show that in some circumstances power is displayed through regimented self control, and in other circumstances power is exhibited through uncontrollability. As my analysis reveals, control can bend and shape to fit hegemonic masculine norms and to protect male privilege and personal masculine identities.