Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Flexible work practices are often promoted as ways to reduce conflicts between work and family. The current model of flexibility as an individual accommodation is problematic for a variety of reasons, including unequal access and potential negative career consequences. Such problems could potentially be minimized through an organizational work-family initiative that allows all employees to work flexibly. We analyze the effects of such an initiative, called STAR, on employees’ flexible work practices (variable schedules and remote work) and perceived schedule control using a group-randomized trial in an information technology workforce. We find that STAR significantly increases the proportion of hours worked remotely, the probability of working a variable schedule, and perceived schedule control; these effects largely persist over the 18 month study period. Some differential effects by gender and parental status are evident, but these benefits of STAR largely accrue to all employees. One potential pitfall of STAR would be if it led to the intensification of work for participating employees, but we find no evidence of an overall increase in work hours for employees in STAR. Additionally, we find that the employees who increase their flexible work practices under STAR also perceive high schedule control, so these increases in flexible work practices likely reflect the preferences of employees when constraints on work practices are removed.