Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
The global rise of non-standard employment is often cited as one of the most important reasons for increasing levels of insecurity over the last 40 years. Yet, non-standard work is also one of the most underdeveloped factors in the literature on perceived worker insecurity. In this paper, we seek to understand the relationship between the most common form of non-standard employment, part-time work, and perceived worker insecurity. We focus on three types of perceived worker insecurity: cognitive job insecurity (perceived likelihood of job loss), labor market insecurity (perceived difficulty of finding a new, comparable job), and affective job insecurity (worrying about the potential threat of job loss). We develop a model of the “institutionalization of part-time work” and test this model using individual-level data for male and female workers from the 2005 ISSP linked to country-level data on various labor market characteristics. At the individual level, the results indicate that part-time work is generally associated with greater cognitive job insecurity for men; less labor market insecurity for men; and, less affective job insecurity for both genders. At the country level, the size of the part-time workforce is not associated with average levels of cognitive job insecurity, but it is generally associated with lower average levels of affective job insecurity, and to a lesser extent, labor market insecurity. Additionally, the size of the part-time workforce has a stronger effect for women than men. Finally, individual-level part-time work interacts significantly with several country-level indicators of flexible work and other labor market characteristics.