Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Using qualitative methods, this study investigates the integration of low-income students in two predominantly middle-class suburban schools, and finds that low-income students’ experiences vary depending on the salience and meaning of their low-income status. Low-income students’ integration is a result of processes occurring at two levels. At the interpersonal level, students engage in boundary formation and maintenance as they negotiate hierarchies through humor, friendship groupings, and other day-to-day activities. At one school, where income is “marked” by minority racial status and income is a stratifying agent, low-income minorities engage in stigma management while low-income whites are able to “pass” as higher-income. At the other school, where income is less visibly marked, the salience of a low-income status is low, and income status does not act as a stratifier. At the organizational level, the spatial layout of campus, curricular tracking, and collective school identity facilitate the status quo. This study has implications for future work on low-income students in higher-income school settings and stresses the importance of further exploring how race, income, and context interact to contribute to the heterogeneity among low-income students in higher-income schools.