Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Ideas about reciprocity commonly occur in young people’s talk about oral sex between men and women, yet we know that oral sex is not always reciprocated: oral-penis contact is more common than oral-vulva contact and occurs in more varied types of partnership. In the context of evident non-reciprocal oral sex, this paper explores the role of discourses of reciprocity in young people’s narratives of oral sex. We show that ideas about like-for-like exchange are in tension with the simultaneous construction of oral-vulva contact as involving greater ‘cost’ than oral-penis contact, both for the ‘giver’ and ‘receiver’. We suggest that emphasis on reciprocity serves three purposes within young people’s narratives of oral heterosex: 1) it enables men to narrate oral-vulva contact in terms of expense, rather than out-and-out cost, by re-focusing attention back on their own gains; 2) it enables women to narrate themselves as challenging gender inequities in oral heterosex; and 3) it diverts attention from other gendered inequities in managing the embodied experience of ‘going down’.