Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
I propose and develop a law-centered rational choice framework for the study of social movements. Current social movement theory and research (SMTR) draws heavily on rational choice principles, yet generally avoids explicit reference to RCT. Also, although legal institutions are among the most influential rational incentive structures conditioning political action at all levels in modern society—including collective social movement behavior—law is by and large theoretically and empirically peripheral to SMTR.. Accordingly, I argue that SMTR can be improved and made more parsimonious by subsuming its two core paradigms—the “political process” and cultural “framing” perspectives—within a broader rational choice framework. Specifically, I contend that a “rational choice institutionalism” (RCI) approach—one significantly focused on law and legal institutions—is an ideal theoretical vehicle through which to build a more general rational choice framework for the study of social movements and collective action. Such a framework can contribute to better understanding and explanation of the incentives, preferences, options, objectives, and actions of social movements. I conclude with an empirical illustration of the U.S. lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) movement to inform how such a framework might be conceived and used in practice.