Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
This paper explores the relationship between contexts of exit and mental health. To illustrate this relationship, I examine the effect of socio-political conditions in country of origin at time of emigration on current level of psychological distress among immigrants living in Toronto, while also considering the role of self-reported pre-migration traumatic events, recent life events, and acculturative stress. Using data on 530 foreign-born respondents from the Neighbourhood Effects on Health and Well-being Study, I find that immigrants from non-conflict countries with high level of human rights violations have greater symptoms of psychological distress than those who emigrated from non-conflict countries with low human rights violations. Self-reported traumatic stress exposure prior to migration had only a modest effect on the observed differences in psychological distress. However, for immigrants who left during internal conflict from countries affected by multiple and ongoing conflicts, greater exposure to both self-reported traumatic events prior to migration and post-migration acculturative stress helps to explain higher level of distress. The mediating effect of acculturative stress is substantial in comparison to that of self-reported traumatic stress experienced prior to migration, explaining over 50% of the difference in psychological distress between immigrants from non-conflict countries with low and high human rights violations. These results show the importance in considering the mental health implications of macro-level factors defining contexts of exit and their subsequent influence in shaping the adaptation of immigrants.