Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Many social scientists and commentators have expressed concerns about the acceleration of genetic science and testing in the last few decades. While there is a growing body of work on how bench scientists view the potential of genetic technologies, there remains relatively little social science research on the personal and professional views of master’s-trained genetic counselors, a growing profession of clinicians who are often the key medical actors translating increasingly complex genetic information to patients. This study begins to fill in this lacuna by examining the perspectives of twenty-six genetic counselors in the U.S. on some of the central bioethical concerns raised by genetic testing, with a particular focus on patient autonomy an informed consent. The findings highlight some ways in which genetic counselors “do ethics” as they face contradictions between various bioethical principles. In particular, this paper shows that in providing “choice” and information, key ethical principles of science and medicine, genetic counselors perhaps ironically limit patients’ autonomy with regard to their rights not to know