Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
The way in which cities attract cultural industries, according to the Rise of the Creative Class (Florida, 2002), is via creating the conditions conducive to the symbolic economy that “creatives” crave – namely art, indie music and culture, with their requisite modes of nostalgia, handicraft and enlightened urbanism. Only this hasn’t “worked” in the sense of a comprehensive economic engine; in Portland notably GDP per capita has risen successfully but Per Capita Income hasn’t; precarious contingent labor that produces rock, craft and cool, has driven growth and cutting edge consumption during the recent “jobless recovery.”
The type of capital indie producers accrue is social wealth, a currency transferrable in to deeper network ties, cooperation and use in the DIY mode of production. This grass roots practice carries the aura of authenticity, in both the identity of the actors doing it (Fine, 2003) and in the way in which history and geography are attended to, even if there is some ‘inventedness’ in the history(s) (Zukin, 2011). Importantly this valorization regime of culture is exceedingly becoming a model for cities to make claims about their candidacy as an aspirant city. In the city of Portland, in the wake of Portlandia, the hit TV show parodying the city, and the politically correct, well-informed consumers of the scene, how does a music scene survive the theming of its collective space? In addition, what is the agency potential for local music production in the new creative city?