Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
This paper analyzes how advocates in Toronto, Canada are responding to the increased presence of border officials in women’s shelters and anti-violence spaces since 2004. I offer a discursive analysis of a social movement campaign supported by over 200 feminist and migrant rights organizations, which called on the Canadian government to provide shelter, sanctuary, and status to all non-status women in cases of gendered violence (2008-2011). My findings distinguish between competing transnational and postnational human rights frames mobilized by differently-positioned actors during the campaign. While the former expands the boundaries of state responsibility to include all women at risk of violence regardless of immigration status, the latter offers a more fundamental challenge to the structural violence produced through existing citizenship and deportation regimes. However, in a climate of increased securitization of state borders, both approaches arguably fall short of addressing non-status women’s multiple and intersecting experiences of precarity, risk, and violence.