Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
This paper brings the discussion of diversification into the symbolic-cognitive realm by examining how sub-category dynamics can be managed to enhance expert audiences’ creativity perception of the diversifier, or what we call perceptual creativity. We argue that when a parent firm’s tradeoff between legitimacy and distinctiveness in labeling offspring surprises industry experts, the perceived creativity in strategic decision-making creates a halo effect around the firm’s core business output. To test our argument, we identify two mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive semantic strategies: semantic autonomy, which refers to disaffiliating the parent’s and the offspring’s names for intra-category differentiation, and semantic seeding, or affiliating the names for legitimacy spillover. Using unique panel data of high-end global fashion houses between 1998 and 2010, we find that a moderate amount of semantic autonomy enhances the perceptual creativity of the parent’s core business output (an inverted U curvilinear relationship), whereas semantic seeding consistently devaluates it. Furthermore, the focal diversifier’s firm-specific characteristics, namely its social and financial standing in the market, moderate the main effects. These findings imply that although a conformity-differentiation tradeoff is inevitable when expanding into a new sub-category niche, the symbolic-strategic management of that tradeoff can lead to higher post-diversification creative performance.