Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
There is a growing interest in sociology for considering “lives in contexts”, i.e. the way we are influenced by the personal communities we are living in. The life-course paradigm (Levy et al, 2005) and other theoretical and methodological schools in social sciences have discovered the importance of “social embeddedness”, i.e. the web of social relations and the support and resources individuals can access through them (Bourdieu 1983; Lin 1982). From this perspective “social resources” or “social capital” should be considered as supplementing economic and cultural capital.
Recent studies about social changes have insisted on the rise of individualism and, at the same time, the reduction of various forms of welfare provision in many countries. In such a context it is even more important to have access to resources through one’s personal relations. The crucial question is, of course, if these resources can (partly) take over functions previously provided by the welfare state and what happens to people who have only limited or no networks?
Such a general question is particularly well suited to be investigated in a comparative perspective even if framing it in different countries is a particular challenge for comparison. The aim of this contribution is to discuss some way to implement a social network approach in a comparative survey like the ISSP that have decided to field this topic in the 2017 edition.