Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
The systemic and material patterns of racism are clearly ongoing and measurable, but the ways in which whiteness is discursively made and re-made are also subject to wide-ranging analysis. US scholars have put forward the color-blind paradigm, while Europeans have worked with 'new racism' and cultural racism' for example. These are means to analyse the trend toward a flexible set of techniques that embed racist hierarchies into the ways collective identities are involved: the micro-level glue that links individuals to systems.
In this paper, based on fieldwork done in urban England over the last decade, I put forward an analysis of the frames my white interviewees use to discuss nation and immigration, and suggest that the patterns emerging constitute a ‘moral economy’ by which the hegemonic form of whiteness is one in which the speaker contrasts him/herself as an ethical agent with unethical Others to express loss and abandonment in a ‘rhetoric of victimage’ (Engels, 2010).
I explore the ways in which discourse on immigration functions to associate social change and a perceived degradation of social conditions with racialised others. I end by making some links with moral economies elsewhere, particularly over the significance of political messages that portray white people as losing out to ethic and racial minorities.