Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Activists rarely, if ever, get everything they want from policy demands. During the policy making process their demands are tempered into political compromises. Do these policy concessions co-opt movements or do they provide activists a foothold for further change? This question is fundamental to democracy: Can movements promote the change they want through democratic processes like policy reform? The movement for protection of animals used in research provides a good case for examining this topic. I examine the impact of federal regulation at the laboratory level by interviewing scientists, bioethicists, veterinarians, and other professionals involved in research with animals. I also use ethnographic and archival data to capture changes that are related to increasing regulations of research using animals. I found that policy reforms created structural access to laboratory decision-making. This access facilitated changes in attitudes and practices of those involved in animal research.