Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Evidence of a public sphere limited by apathy and a lack of creativity is a well-documented phenomenon. Yet the praxeological mechanisms through which such characteristics emerge remains under-theorized. We examine civic engagement practices in a comparative ethnographic case study of eat-local movements, identifying ‘small-p politics’ as a dominant practice. We ask the following questions: why do participants’ adopt small-p politics? And what are the limitations of this form of engagement for food system transformation? Small-p politics are pleasurable, non-confrontational and pragmatic approaches to collective action. Paradoxically, the mechanisms that mobilize and sustain engagement in the eat-local movement lead to a thinning of imagined pathways towards political change. We discuss implications for the study of depoliticization and citizen apathy.