Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
How did the politics of gay liberation become the politics of LGBT rights? How did our understanding of sexuality become tethered to an identity-based model? This article studies intra- and inter-organizational debates within the LGBT legal organizations. Taking dissent over litigation strategy, the right to be sexual, and sodomy reform as a starting point, the article rejects the simple liberation to assimilation narrative. Instead, sodomy reform—and ultimately LGBT rights—always included a concern with the right to be sexual. The right to be sexual stood in tension with the right to privacy. This tension drove the development of LGBT rights as a category.
Through this article, we get a richer sense of how sexuality as a category is constructed in and through the law. We see how the inchoate goals of the right to be sexual become LGBT rights. But we also see moments of historical contingency, real possibilities of other legal strategies around the right to be sexual. By taking this contingency seriously, rather than looking for how it was resolved, we can better appreciate the ambiguous and contested meanings of LBBT rights. This has payoffs for how we think about the development of the LGBT legal movement as well as how we think about constitutional law.