Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Across the sciences, journals, grant agencies, and professional organizations have begun demanding increased transparency, more focus on replication, and new ways to draw valid conclusions from complex literatures. Although previous research has investigated aspects of these changes, few studies understood them as part of a unitary phenomenon that represents a deep challenge to prevailing scientific practice. Extending research on objectivity, we introduce the term “forensic objectivity” to describe a package of reforms that includes increased disclosure and the turn toward a meta-analytic mindset. Through a case study of social psychology, we demonstrate how epistemological activists are promoting these changes by highlighting replication failures and conducting statistical forensics which cast doubt on entire literatures. Implications for both scientific practice and the science studies are discussed.