Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
In Event: 395 - Section on the Sociology of the Family Paper Session. Sexualities in Family Contexts
Despite evidence of growing support for same-sex couples, nations continue to vary widely. Very little is known about the extent to which respondents embrace same-sex parents as equivalent to heterosexual parents, how this varies comparatively, what shapes differential support between individuals, and how a country’s political, cultural, and economic context explains variation in support. Further, changes in attitudes toward same-sex parents have paralleled a general movement away from nuclear, heterosexual families, making it unclear how support for same-sex parents is tied to respondents’ ideological and structural approaches to family. We address these issues with cross-sectional data from the 2012 ISSP. This unique data set allows us to compare individuals’ support for same-sex and single parent families with that of male-female parents across 36 nations. The results of hierarchical models show that respondents who are female, younger, more educated, and less religious have greater support for same-sex and single parents. However, some socio-demographic characteristics shape support differentially. For example, being female is tied to general support for non-traditional families, favoring single and same-sex parents equally, but being married is linked to an emphasis on traditional families, with a preference for two parents, regardless of sexuality. Among nations, those with stronger family rights for same-sex couples have higher levels of support, regardless of controls. Finally, cross-level interactions show that the effect of individual-level cleavages varies systematically across nations depending on the context of same-sex family rights. In other words, greater same-sex family rights can both enable and undermine individual cleavages.