Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Satellite images are generally seen to show true evidence of events on the ground, as understood by the public and as framed by popular discourse. However, this is a constructed truth status through the framing of images as technological artifacts similar to camera photographs. Analysis of court testimony by satellite imaging experts in the International Criminal Court exposes how images are understood by scientists, through various levels of uncertainty, as well as exposing a deeper explanation of how they are constructed as technical data outputs. This paper argues that despite the expert understanding, satellite images still retain a ‘technovisual authority’ in how they are circulated and consumed, displaying the disconnect between the technical and the epistemological and the power that is attributed to how ‘truth’ is constructed.