Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
This project compares television and newspaper coverage of fracking in an attempt to assess the possibility of differential coverage leading audiences toward differential stances regarding the issue. After explaining why the theoretical link between media coverage and environmental attitudes is less than straightforward, I outline three different facets of how media sources convey information—through facts, through images, and through quantities of coverage. I then examine media coverage of fracking through each of these three facets. My results suggest that quantities of coverage are more important than facts or images, but not to the extent that content is totally irrelevant.